tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4635099559879829209.post7670385066226599141..comments2024-03-10T01:23:59.971+02:00Comments on Astrology and everything else: Astrologer charts - Liz Greene and John FrawleyPetros Eleftheriadishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13162556344887462025noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4635099559879829209.post-56119456353280719652012-07-15T03:12:53.474+03:002012-07-15T03:12:53.474+03:00Greene's stance is Astrologers, in the main, t...Greene's stance is Astrologers, in the main, talk about people so they need to study them first. Common sense really. <br />To involve oneself in Astrology in 2012 without having a good grasp of Psychological realities seems a bit like playing a game of football without knowing the rules. <br />It's possible that Frawley has spent considerable time with the Psychological Literature. Rob Petersnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4635099559879829209.post-82502651533689995992012-01-04T01:23:15.037+02:002012-01-04T01:23:15.037+02:00Petros, 'Anonymou's point was clear enough...Petros, 'Anonymou's point was clear enough: a deep look at character is inevitable in astrology. More, his genuinity is also clear in his double-standard as both an 'atheist' BUT also averse to anything from the 'left' - he has not accused more than those 'channelers' of truth we all love to hate - and they are hateable, although 'reformable', nothing staysaurelianoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4635099559879829209.post-76655204706354064512010-12-21T22:46:39.165+02:002010-12-21T22:46:39.165+02:00So, anonymous, you say you've cultivated toler...So, anonymous, you say you've cultivated tolerance but you don't seem to show any tolerance towards those who "refuse to grow up" and believe in stupid things like religion and fate, is that it? Interesting... <br /><br />You seem to be doing exactly what you accuse other astrologers of doing. You've found an astrology that mirrors your belief that there is no fate. Or at Petros Eleftheriadishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13162556344887462025noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4635099559879829209.post-32372710672596130742010-12-21T21:38:59.826+02:002010-12-21T21:38:59.826+02:00Personally I prefer Greene. I am an atheist and a ...Personally I prefer Greene. I am an atheist and a Libertarian, and find many modern astrologers to be forcing their religious and leftist views into their astrological analysis, all while pretending they are "channeling" the TRUTH of the cosmos, rather than simply thier selves.<br /><br />I am not interested in pretending to believe in "fate", "destiny", or other Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4635099559879829209.post-46218335786422480192010-08-28T10:13:00.664+03:002010-08-28T10:13:00.664+03:00They do seem incompatible, don't they? And ind...They do seem incompatible, don't they? And indeed they are if you view them both as astrologers. But, I think, Liz Greene is primarily a psychologist and not an astrologer. She simply uses astrological symbols to help her psychology. As a result, she is not interested in astrological technique, not that much anyway. From the John Frawley viewpoint, this makes her chart readings unreliable andPetros Eleftheriadishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13162556344887462025noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4635099559879829209.post-68148369538118041042010-08-28T09:13:13.268+03:002010-08-28T09:13:13.268+03:00In terms of the actual practise of astrology, deli...In terms of the actual practise of astrology, delineation-wise, Frawley demonstrates a deft grasp of craft, whereas Greene's efforts always left me questioning her technique and sensing her need to cherry pick and move towards tendentious conclusions. As to their approaches and theoretical positions, well it's a matter of choosing your poison... I applaud your fair-mindedness and Richard Smykowskyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06901640172721601162noreply@blogger.com